Independent Australian editorial · est. 2019

Agency Network

DMA Australia

Helping you find the best digital agency across Melbourne, Sydney, Brisbane, Perth and Hobart.

SEM agencies

What good Google Ads management looks like in Australia

Account structure, brand versus non-brand, in-house versus agency, and why a media commission is not the same thing as a management fee.

By DMA Editorial · DMA Australia · 25 February 2026

Large illuminated advertising screens at Piccadilly Circus

Image: Roger Davies · CC BY-SA 2.0. See all image credits.

A Google Ads account is easy to open and hard to keep honest. That is why Australian companies hire SEM agencies, and why so many of those relationships disappoint: the login looks busy, the spend continues, and nobody can say whether the incremental sale needed the click.

Good management is not a secret bid strategy. It is structure, a clean split between brand and non-brand, an account you own, and a fee that pays for labour rather than for the privilege of touching the budget. The rest of the SEM agencies hub covers privacy and pricing. This piece is the operating manual.

If you are still choosing the shop, use the same questions you would ask of any firm in how to choose a digital marketing agency in Australia. Then add the ones below. Paid search is faster than SEO and less forgiving of a sloppy brief.

The account you inherit is usually a mess

Most new relationships start with an account that has been loved by three people and understood by none. Campaigns named after the year they were built. Conversion actions that fire on thank-you page loads and on button clicks. A Performance Max campaign that was switched on during a quiet week and never interrogated. Brand terms sitting inside a generic campaign so the reported cost per lead looks cheaper than it is.

The first useful month is a clean-up, not a scale-up. A serious agency will say that. They will pause what they cannot explain, fix the conversion graph, and tell you which of last quarter's numbers you should stop quoting. A less serious agency will leave the mess and “optimise” it, because a messy baseline is easy to beat in a case study.

Ask for a written audit with decisions, not observations. “You have 90 ad groups” is an observation. “We will collapse these 90 into twelve themes because the queries already overlap” is a decision. You should be able to approve the decisions. You should not need a certification to read them.

Structure before spend

Structure is how you keep the story of the account intelligible. There is no single correct architecture. There is a wrong one: a pile of campaigns that exist because someone needed a place to put a budget.

A workable Australian search account usually separates:

Intent. People looking for you, people looking for the category, people looking for a comparison, people looking for a problem you solve. Those queries do not deserve the same bids or the same landing pages.

Geography. National, state, city, and radius are different products. A Sydney plumber and a national insurer should not share a template. If you sell differently in Perth and Brisbane — freight, store coverage, regulation — the campaigns should be able to say so.

Match and query control. Broad match with good negatives and a conversion signal can work. Broad match with a weak offer and a lead form that a bot can finish will spend. The agency should show you search terms, not only keyword lists. If they cannot, they are managing the interface, not the demand.

The automated campaigns. Performance Max and Demand Gen can be useful. They can also vacuum brand queries and call the blend a success. If you run them, ask what happens to brand when PMax is on.

Shopping is its own craft. An agency that treats the feed as “the client's problem” is not a shopping agency. Landing pages are part of the account. The page has to keep the promise of the ad. If it cannot, fix the page or stop bidding.

Brand versus non-brand

This is the split that most monthly reports still blur, because blended numbers look better.

Brand search is the set of queries that already include your name, your product names, and the obvious misspellings. You are usually paying to stand in front of a person who was going to find you. That can still be rational: competitors can bid on your name, resellers can sit above you, and the map pack does not always send the click you want. It is not, by itself, evidence that the agency is creating demand.

Non-brand is the work. Category terms, problem terms, competitor terms if you choose to fight them, and the long queries that only convert when the page is good. This is where structure, copy, and landing pages earn the fee. It is also where ROAS looks worse, which is why weak shops hide it inside the blend.

Ask for brand and non-brand in every report, every week, with spend, conversions, and cost per outcome. Ask what happens to non-brand when brand is excluded from PMax. If the agency cannot do that exclusion, or will not, they are not ready to talk about efficiency.

Impression share on brand is a health check. If you are losing branded auctions to yourself — search plus PMax plus a shopping campaign — you are paying Google to compete with Google. That is common. It is also fixable.

Agency versus in-house

In-house makes sense when the spend is large enough to hire and keep someone good, when the product knowledge is the scarce resource, and when you want the bidding next to the merchandising meeting. It fails when that person is a lone operator with no cover, or when the role is given to a generalist who already runs the social calendar.

An agency makes sense when you need coverage, a specialist bench, and someone who has seen a hundred merchant centres fail in the same way. It fails when the account is small and the agency is large: you will get the leftover hours. It also fails when the agency's process cannot absorb your pricing, stock, and legal constraints.

A hybrid many Australian teams should consider: keep brand in-house and hire an agency for non-brand, shopping, and the experiments. The agency then has to beat a baseline you can see.

Fee models: management fee versus media commission

There are two common ways to pay, and a cluster of hybrids. None of them is moral. Some of them are easier to keep honest.

A flat management fee. You pay for the labour. The media goes to Google from an account billed to you. As spend rises, the fee can be renegotiated, but it does not automatically swell. This is the model we prefer once the account is past the “someone checks it on Tuesdays” stage. It rewards the work you asked for, not the budget you happened to have.

A percentage of media. Commonly in the teens on smaller accounts, lower as spend grows. It is simple, and it aligns the agency with keeping the account alive. It also pays them more when you increase budget for a sale you would have run anyway. If you use it, put a floor so they can afford the work in a quiet month, and a ceiling so a media spike is not a bonus for nothing.

Commission or markup on media. You need to see the net media cost. A hidden markup on Google Ads, where the platform already bills the advertiser, is a smell.

Hybrid. A base fee plus a smaller percentage, or a base plus a performance element. The base should cover the hours. The variable bit should be tied to an outcome you both can audit. For market ranges, see what Australian agencies actually charge.

GST is extra. Production is often extra. You own the account, the pixels, and the conversion actions. The agency works through a manager account. If they will only build in their own login, you will discover the cost on the day you leave.

What weekly work looks like

A managed search account is not a set-and-forget algorithm. Someone should be reading search terms, adding negatives, killing ads that lost, testing one change at a time, and telling you when the offer — not the bid — is the constraint.

Weekly is the right cadence for most mid-market accounts. “The algorithm is learning” is not an update. You should see what changed, why, and what they will not do until you fix the page. Seasonality is an Australian fact: EOFY, January, school holidays. An agency that discovers EOFY in the first week of June is not planning.

Australian specifics worth putting in the brief

Do not bid nationally if you cannot fulfil outside two cities. Search Partners and display expansion are extra inventory, not free demand. Call-only and lead forms can manufacture conversions that never become jobs. Define what a qualified lead is.

Customer lists — Customer Match — are a media tactic and a privacy decision. Uploading emails to Google is disclosing personal information under the Privacy Act. Document why, and do not treat a leftover spreadsheet as an audience.

A buyer's checklist you can run in an hour

Open the account. Confirm you are the owner. Check whether brand is inflating conversions, whether PMax can take brand, and whether last month's search terms look like demand you want. Then ask them to explain one week of labour, not a result. If they cannot, you are buying a login and a story.

Good management is dull when it is working: a clean structure, a visible brand split, an account you could take back on Friday, and a fee that would still make sense if spend halved. The decoration is optional. The hygiene is not.

Questions marketers actually ask

Should the agency own our Google Ads account?
No. The account should sit under your company. The agency gets access through an MCC. If they will only work in an account they own, you are renting your own data.
Is a percentage of spend a fair fee?
It can be, on a small account, if the percentage is visible and the work is real. It gets harder to defend as spend grows, because the invoice rises even when the work does not.
Can we keep brand search in-house and give an agency the rest?
Yes, and many teams should. Brand is usually simpler. Non-brand, shopping, and demand gen are where specialist labour earns its keep.